Skip to main content

Police to be Held Accountable? Perhaps!



wikimedia commons
In the public domain in the United States
Waage als Sinnbild für das Bemühen um Gleichgewicht zwischen dem Universum und der Welt der Menschen (Makro-und Mikrokosmos)


The debate over police tactics continues to rage across the country in the wake of shootings, demonstrations, grand jury deliberations and mounting outrage from protesters and police alike. It is also being played out in Albuquerque, New Mexico--not a place often found in the same sentence as Ferguson.  

In this unlikely town, the district attorney has filed murder charges against two officers involved in the shooting death of a homeless man last year.  The Albuquerque Police Department has been the focus of repeated protests over police-involved shootings. Albuquerque police shot and killed 27 people between 2010 and 2014, according to records kept by the Albuquerque Journal. 

Charges follow the shooting death of James Boyd last March.  According to police, Boyd was shot holding two knives. However, film footage from one of the officer's mandated body cameras appears to show Boyd turning away from officers just before the officers opened fire. 

Unlike the typical grand jury proceedings which are veiled in secrecy and filled with questions, these criminal charges were filed and subject to a preliminary hearing, which is part of the public record. 

While there is debate on both sides of the issue regarding the use of force and what is necessary and appropriate, the public at large is calling for answers.  This case is to follow. It may signal a change in the handling of police shooting across the country.








http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/01/14/in-albuquerque-protests-against-police-shootings-and-charges-against-officers/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Difference Between Mediation and Arbitration

The Morgue File So you need to resolve a legal dispute and must make a choice between these two alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, While the basic differences between mediation and arbitration lie in methodology, these differences may also affect the ultimate outcome of your dispute. Therefore, it is helpful to know not only the basic differences but also the pros and cons of those differences. In the most basic language, a mediation is a settlement while an arbitration is a decision on the merits of the case. While both are considered alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in that both avoid a full trial, including the costs of the trial, you must prepare for each differently. In a mediation, both sides of a dispute meet with a mediator who attempts to broker a settlement of the matter. It is usually more informal than an arbitration and also less costly . Usually, mediation is a good tool to use in situations where the parties are not too far apart in their ...

First, Kill Off All The Lawyers

Shakespeare said it best. Lawyers get a bad rap for good reasons. They are hugely expensive, they deal in an area of life we either don't want to touch or feel we can't deal with, and sometimes, they are money grubbing scumbags. So why do we need them, or do we. They answer is . .well maybe! I know that isn't what we most want to hear. But law is a complicated business and most of us just don't want to have to go there in our daily lives. Not only that, but legal minutia can drive a person crazy. Have you ever tried looking at a statute? Here is is really good example of statutory construction that is just mind boggling for the non-attorney, California Probate Code Section 13101: 13101. (a) To collect money, receive tangible personal property, or have evidences of a debt, obligation, interest, right, security, or chose in action transferred under this chapter, an affidavit or a declaration under penalty of perjury under the laws of this state shall be furnished to the...

Read before you sign

wikimedia commons  Corunna Coal Company 1890 Union Contract We live in a society that values orderliness. We like to know whose turn it is to proceed when we reach a four-way stop. We like to know what to expect in a given situation. This is the benefit that law can provide us. We like to know what is expected of us. If A, then B. If A happens before D, C happens. If no A, no B, etc. We enter into contracts all the time. Today, as never before, our lives are lived in an online world. We sign up for a service online. We buy products online. We "agree" to the terms of service without ever reading them.  We sign a document placed before us without reading it. We bind ourselves to unknown terms. We enter into contracts blindly. In California, and in other states. If you have signed it, you are deemed to have read it. That means you cannot plead ignorance to the contents of any document you sign. If you have signed it, if you have agreed to its terms by "click...